Search:

success systems mind power website info information healing positive relax music wealth healing attraction exit mind evolution law of attraction happiness health mental codes hypnosis positive mind

Bacterial Flagellum - Evolution's Nightmare & Demise

Bookmark and Share
Forex Automoney - Make Money Just by Clicking
Trust In Rock
Trust In Rock Trust In Rock
Trust In Rock

Bookmark and Share

About the Bacterial Flagellum video and more: More at http://www.detectingdesign.com... Detailed response to Nick Matzke's proposition on the bacterial flagellum: http://www.idthink.net/biot/in... Another video (unrelated to the flagellum but very impressive): http://aimediaserver.com/studi... -Evolutionist claim that all of life's features (example: the bacterial flagellum) can be explained by the purely material process described in their theory - accidental mutations sorted by natural selection. However, Intelligent Design (ID) theory makes the claim that certain features exist in the universe (including features of life) that are BEST explained by an intelligent cause (ie. a cause with a goal or purpose - ergo originating from a mind). With the scientific hypothesis of intelligent causation, and the objective explanatory filter developed by Dr William Dembski - http://www.uncommondescent.com... - ID theory has quickly & firmly established itself as the "official" headache for the most ardent evolutionists today. Those that are informed know what is at stake, and that the explanatory power of the intelligent design theory is effectively guaranteed to supplant a purely materialist theory of evolution in time. This can be seen in how ID has reached a type of critical mass of acceptance - wherewith about a hundred classes are already taught in various universities (including the Ivy league). Classes whcih challenge purely materialistic thinking and more critically analyze the theory of evolution. The growth will continue as more objective & open minded scientists & students eager to explore better explanations continue to pursue better science. Dr Michael Behe (author of "Darwins Black Box" & proponent of ID) popularized the term *irreducible complexity* to describe features in life which are complex and yet their function can not be reduced without destroying the primary function and usefulness of the system/function to the host organism. In the case seen in the video, the bacteruial flagellum has approximately 40 finely matched protein parts that must all be in place for the bacterial flagellum (w/ motor) to work. Furthermore, the assembly process of this motor is one of the key overlooked aspects of the problem of this systems development - ie. even the assembly program/process is arguably irreducibly complex. So, not only does a bacteria need to have the DNA coded for the correct proteins, the whole cell has to 'know' WHERE to put each protein part and WHEN to put it there. This is an astronomically improbable task to acheive through random fortuitous increases in instruction sequences (which to this day remains purely hypothetical - ie. imaginary) and parts specifications - consider the relative size of the cell surface area to the size of the bacterial flagellum and the chances each molecular part will assemble in the correct location & with the correct timing for assembly. So, the whole machine and the ORDER or sequence of system assembly is critical to success! If the whole universe were a fishbowl like earth's oceans - except fully teeming with bacteria - for 15 billion years, there would still be insufficient probablistic resources to accomplish the feat of builindg up such a comparable system even once. It's no wonder that ID theory is so satisfying to the many open minded scientist it has attracted. Unfortunately, most evolutionist oppose this theory based strictly on materialistic beliefs. And this is a true detriment to real science. They stubbornly maintain their faith in natural selection - listen to Richard Dawkins - note especially the last words in the following video: http://www.arn.org/docs/dawkin... [Excerpt - In exressing why natural selection is believed to find creative designs/solutions to all these kinds of intermediate problems]: "Natural selection is uhmmm..uhhh.. well, I suppose that is a sort of matter of faith on my part." - Richard Dawkins If never before, you have now found that faith is a absolute neccessity and type of trade-secret of even the most outspoken of evolutionist. So, don't be their fool when they say evolution is a scientific fact. It's almost assured, in my opinion, that future generations will find it hard to believe that people ever accepted the theoy of evolution with the information we have at our disposal. Recent breakthroughs in accelerated protein folding algorithms will, I believe likely, lead to some very uncomforting news for adherents of evolutionary theory - news that could bring that described future closer to our doorsteps - and evolutionists fade into the history books as the mystics of these days... stay tuned. :)

Channel: Science & Technology
Uploaded: November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am
Author: jameskguy

Length: 01:48
Rating: 2.9116247
Views: 141838

Tags: bacterial  flagellum  intelligent  design  irreducible  complexity  evolution  creation  dembski  behe  

Video Url:


Embed Code:

Video Comments

Orkaney (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@tubewatch59 I searched for many years for the meaning of life and an understanding of the world I live in. The way I did this was by reading, pondering and questioning people I met. As my understanding grew, I noticed that those belonging to faiths had a less than ideal attitude towards honesty, which to me raises concern. It's up to others to draw their own conclusions about Jesus of Nasareth, I've drawn mine. Do you hate Frøy? How about Ægir? How does one hate something nonexistent?
tubewatch59 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Orkaney I think you don't want to believe in the Christian God, and so you're saying that as long as there is some doubt about it, then that lets you off the hook. After all if God made His "daily appearance", daily "state of the heavens speech", and a "daily miracle", then I guess you'd worship reluctantly, and wonder about whether there's any other power in the universe able to take the "hated God" on. Right? Proof of God's existence and power, won't remove the natural hatred of God.
tubewatch59 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Orkaney We wouldn't dispute anyone from history if we didn';t know about them. If they're written about though, then we're made aware of them, and can decide whether or not to believe (often without proof) that they existed or not. Usually, the more someone is written about, tends to lend credence to their existence. I think you're against the existence of the man Jesus, because you're in opposition to Christianity. And you do have direct access to arguments for ID, and a Bible.
tubewatch59 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Orkaney I don't think that's a particularly reasonable position to take. I am sure that there are many historical people that most believe existed, but for which we have no proof either. Would you insist that they also didn't exist? I mean, how can you insist that someone didn't exist unless we have 100% proof of it? I'm not talking about Christ's claims to Deity, just the existence of a man called Christ. You're denial of his existence is as committed against, as those committed for.
Orkaney (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@tubewatch59 If there was a Jesus of Nasareth, Christians would have found proof by now. Evidence for his existence has been searched for since around 100 years after his supposed death. Why didn't any of the disciples keep memories if they loved him so much? I don't deny for the existence of people named Jesus in general, just the one in the bible. If there was a deity wishing for us to interact with it, we'd all have direct access to sufficient knowledge for its existence. We don't.
tubewatch59 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@Orkaney Why would you assume that Jesus Christ never lived? hat seems a little extreme! most atheists or unbelievers would allow that Christ may have lived, was just a man, and not God. But you state flat out he never lived. Why say that?
tnolte (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IwillhonorGod "If you have not accepted God by the time you die, you are going to find your self in hell fire!" And you're OK with this? Why would I want to worship something that does that to people? You sound like a brainwashed, egotistical douche bag. The different types of Christians show the different personalities of people. You are the selfish kind, that would want nothing more than for the people that don't believe what you believe to be tortured FOREVER. You're sick.
Orkaney (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IwillhonorGod Do your homework? Good enough point for you?
Orkaney (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@crocfme So far, my experience with religion and its followers disappoint me, especially revolving honesty. I hope one day to see their texts placed where they rightfully belong, in the fiction section. There was no Jesus of Nasareth or Christians would have found proof by now. Linking fictious characters with actual ones don't make them more real. Good things are said in many texts throughout time but when most parts of one text is bad, I'd rather discard the whole text than quote it.
ExtantFrodo (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@IwillhonorGod "I don't know why you are making comments, let them make themselves out of nothing on there own. " Like your god did right? Your "god did it" theory answers nothing with nothing but fiction.

S2U.Info Copyright © 2006 - 2010 All Rights Reserved. Videos are copyright their respective owners.